Android IPC Compared with Java Native Interface JNI

Remote procedure calls (RPC) using Android's inter-process communications largely replace the use of the Java Native Interface (JNI) in Android. In almost all cases, a remote procedure call is efficient enough to make it a superior alternative to loading a library—especially one that dynamically allocates a significant amount of memory— into the Java virtual machine's address space. And if a process exposing an RPC interface fails, it is less likely to bring down the Android UI with it.

Android inter-process communication behaves a lot like JNI: the caller's thread is blocked until the result is returned. Marshalling data across the IPC boundary is about the same amount of work as data conversions in JNI. But Binder-based remote procedure calls have a significant advantage over JNI: if non-Java code crashes or runs out of memory, the caller of a remote procedure call gets an error that must be handled, but the Java application does not crash. Remote procedure calls are a more robust way to call "external" libraries and subject the Java application to fewer risks in the form of clashing memory management strategies and other differences between Java applications and libraries implemented in languages other than Java.

0 -1

Post a comment